Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Ladder Capital Corp
How Ladder Capital Corp stacks up
LADR · against 251 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Profitability
26/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #197 of 252 · scores higher than 22% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score24 peers with a profitability score of 20–29, including LADR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 26?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly because of its return on assets and return on invested capital, which are weaker than most Real Estate peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 71% of peers. Return on assets: 0.9% vs peer median 2.1%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 71% of peers. Return on invested capital: 1.9% vs peer median 3.4%
- Operating margin is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LADR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LADR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 247 reported | 1.9% | 3.5% | 25% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 240 reported | Not reported | 33.3% | — | — | 33% |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 248 reported | 0.9% | 2.2% | 28% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 245 reported | 3.6% | 5.9% | 40% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 253 reported | 69.2% | 57.3% | 68% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LADR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17.42T IDR (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 83 | |
| 1 | 12.2B BRL (≈$2.2B) | 100 | 83 | |
| 3 | 44.3B TWD (≈$1.4B) | 99 | 94 | |
| 3 | 7.7B BRL (≈$1.4B) | 99 | 90 | |
| 3 | 6.0B BRL (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 91 | |
| 190 | 65.5B INR (≈$786M) | 28 | 57 | |
| 190 | 1.1B USD | 28 | 50 | |
| 190 | 1.8B USD | 28 | 60 | |
| 196 | 5.0B HKD (≈$634M) | 27 | 34 | |
| 197 | 1.2B USD | 26 | 21 | |
| 197 | 1.3B USD | 26 | 14 | |
| 199 | 2.0B USD | 25 | 24 | |
| 200 | 42.0B THB (≈$1.2B) | 24 | 27 | |
| 201 | 944M EUR (≈$1.0B) | 23 | 25 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score