Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
L · against 130 other Banks & Insurance companies of similar size
Ranked #70 of 131 · scores higher than 46% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score15 peers with a profitability score of 50–59, including L · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger return on assets, but weaker return on equity than most Banks & Insurance peers.
| Metric | L | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 105 reported | 9.9% | 11.0% | 46% | Context only | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 14 reported | Not reported | 17.2% | — | — | Context only |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 131 reported | 1.9% | 1.3% | 71% | 50% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 130 reported | 9.3% | 13.8% | 17% | 50% | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 135 reported | 36.3% | 0.0% | 77% | Context only |
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 79.2B BRL (≈$14.3B) | 98 | 61 | |
| 1 | 536.3B ZAR (≈$29.5B) | 98 | 54 | |
| 1 | 24.3B AUD (≈$16.0B) | 98 | 45 | |
| 1 | 11.4B USD | 98 | 66 | |
| 5 | 11.6B GBP (≈$15.0B) | 97 | 51 | |
| 65 | 1.07T INR (≈$12.8B) | 61 | 66 | |
| 68 | 452.3B NOK (≈$43.0B) | 60 | 41 | |
| 68 | 440.5B SEK (≈$44.0B) | 60 | 35 | |
| 70 | 14.3B EUR (≈$15.8B) | 59 | 42 | |
| 70 | 22.5B USD | 59 | 58 | |
| 72 | 24.4B USD | 58 | 54 | |
| 73 | 841.4B TWD (≈$26.1B) | 57 | ||
| 73 | 601.0B THB (≈$16.8B) | 57 | 46 | |
| 73 | 18.6B EUR (≈$20.4B) | 57 | 64 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score