Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Quaker Chemical Corporation
How Quaker Chemical Corporation stacks up
KWR · against 353 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Valuation
45/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #224 of 354 · scores higher than 36% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score47 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including KWR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 45?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Basic Materials norm.
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 3.8% vs peer median 3.6%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 6.7% vs peer median 8.5%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 2.9% vs peer median 2.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = KWR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | KWR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 348 reported | 3.8% | 4.7% | 41% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 360 reported | 8.6% | 9.7% | 42% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 94 reported | 2.9% | 3.9% | 45% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 340 reported | 53.5% | 56.0% | 48% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around KWR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.39T ARS (≈$1.4B) | 100 | 53 | |
| 2 | 2.73T KRW (≈$2.0B) | 99 | 57 | |
| 2 | 2.6B USD | 99 | 81 | |
| 4 | 69.8B ZAR (≈$3.8B) | 98 | 76 | |
| 4 | 4.7B AUD (≈$3.1B) | 98 | 87 | |
| 220 | 151.4B INR (≈$1.8B) | 46 | 59 | |
| 224 | 35.8B CNY (≈$5.0B) | 45 | 36 | |
| 224 | 11.3B CNY (≈$1.6B) | 45 | 31 | |
| 224 | 147.4B INR (≈$1.8B) | 45 | 70 | |
| 224 | 2.6B USD | 45 | 51 | |
| 224 | 2.0B USD | 45 | 23 | |
| 229 | 11.6B CNY (≈$1.6B) | 44 | 62 | |
| 229 | 3.0B SGD (≈$2.2B) | 44 | 43 | |
| 229 | 2.0B AUD (≈$1.3B) | 44 | 33 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score