Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Quaker Chemical Corporation
How Quaker Chemical Corporation stacks up
KWR · against 343 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Growth
83/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #60 of 344 · scores higher than 82% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score30 peers with a growth score of 80–89, including KWR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 83?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Basic Materials peers.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 0.0% vs peer median -0.0%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 62% of peers. Revenue growth: 7.8% vs peer median 3.4%
- Earnings per share turned from a loss to a profit. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 9.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = KWR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | KWR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 348 reported | 7.8% | 4.9% | 55% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 249 reported | Not reported | 13.4% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 339 reported | 0.0% | 1.2% | 47% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around KWR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.29T ARS (≈$2.3B) | 100 | 85 | |
| 2 | 11.8B HKD (≈$1.5B) | 99 | 77 | |
| 2 | 4.2B CAD (≈$3.0B) | 99 | 74 | |
| 4 | 3.3B USD | 98 | 66 | |
| 4 | 7.5B AUD (≈$5.0B) | 98 | 79 | |
| 56 | 11.5B CNY (≈$1.6B) | 84 | 77 | |
| 56 | 28.8B HKD (≈$3.7B) | 84 | 67 | |
| 56 | 11.7B CNY (≈$1.6B) | 84 | 42 | |
| 60 | 2.4B USD | 83 | 67 | |
| 60 | 2.6B USD | 83 | 51 | |
| 60 | 1.5B USD | 83 | 63 | |
| 60 | 3.21T ARS (≈$3.2B) | 83 | 69 | |
| 64 | 11.6B CNY (≈$1.6B) | 82 | 60 | |
| 64 | 91.1B TRY (≈$2.7B) | 82 | 77 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score