Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Joint Stock Company Kaspi.kz
How Joint Stock Company Kaspi.kz stacks up
KSPI · against 171 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
93/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #4 of 172 · scores higher than 98% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score8 peers with a valuation score of 90–100, including KSPI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 93?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
- EBITDA yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 93% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 6.2% vs peer median 2.7%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 98% of peers. Earnings yield: 13.5% vs peer median 2.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = KSPI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | KSPI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 171 reported | 13.3% | 3.1% | 99% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 171 reported | Not reported | 5.0% | — | — | 50% |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 106 reported | 12.4% | 3.3% | 97% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 166 reported | Not reported | 17.9% | — | — | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around KSPI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.5B USD | 97 | 56 | |
| 2 | 3.89T JPY (≈$26.5B) | 94 | 73 | |
| 2 | 20.1B USD | 94 | 68 | |
| 4 | 17.5B USD | 93 | 93 | |
| 4 | 10.6B USD | 93 | 68 | |
| 6 | 28.8B USD | 92 | 70 | |
| 6 | 20.0B USD | 92 | 78 | |
| 8 | 16.9B USD | 91 | 57 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score