Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Kura Sushi USA, Inc.
How Kura Sushi USA, Inc. stacks up
KRUS · against 586 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Profitability
13/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #497 of 587 · scores higher than 15% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score77 peers with a profitability score of 10–19, including KRUS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 13?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its operating margin, return on invested capital and return on assets, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 87% of peers. Operating margin: -1.4% vs peer median 6.4%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 86% of peers. Return on invested capital: -1.7% vs peer median 7.3%
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 85% of peers. Return on assets: -0.4% vs peer median 3.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = KRUS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | KRUS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 559 reported | -1.7% | 5.3% | 17% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 585 reported | -1.4% | 5.1% | 15% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 557 reported | -0.4% | 2.3% | 18% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 545 reported | -0.9% | 5.3% | 24% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 588 reported | 16.4% | 27.1% | 26% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around KRUS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9.10T IDR (≈$564M) | 99 | 85 | |
| 1 | 1.5B BRL (≈$267M) | 99 | 92 | |
| 3 | 396M AUD (≈$262M) | 98 | 78 | |
| 3 | 418M USD | 98 | 53 | |
| 5 | 22.1B TWD (≈$685M) | 97 | 65 | |
| 497 | 22.0B TWD (≈$681M) | 13 | 24 | |
| 497 | 11.2B TWD (≈$348M) | 13 | 13 | |
| 497 | 3.3B CNY (≈$456M) | 13 | 23 | |
| 497 | 255M USD | 13 | 35 | |
| 497 | 442M USD | 13 | 33 | |
| 503 | 2.9B CNY (≈$408M) | 12 | 28 | |
| 503 | 3.8B CNY (≈$528M) | 12 | 30 | |
| 503 | 2.8B CNY (≈$398M) | 12 | 50 | |
| 503 | 2.6B CNY (≈$369M) | 12 | 21 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score