How Kura Sushi USA, Inc. stacks up

KRUS · against 586 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size

Overall

33/ 100

Near the bottom of its peers.

Ranked #442 of 587 · scores higher than 23% of peers

Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the overall score

81 peers with an overall score of 30–39, including KRUS · Click a bar to see the companies

The four scores behind it

Overall = average of valuation, growth, profitability and safety percentile (categories without data are skipped)

Valuation#466 of 575Score 13 / 100 · beats 18%Growth#77 of 583Score 85 / 100 · beats 87%Profitability#497 of 587Score 13 / 100 · beats 15%Risk#483 of 574Higher relative risk · safety 22 · beats 16%

Ranking by overall score

Top 5 and the companies ranked around KRUS

Rank	Company	Market cap	Overall	Valuation	Growth	Profitability	Risk
1	Track & Field Co S.A.TFCO4.SA · Brazil	1.5B BRL (≈$267M)	92	80	99	99	0 / 2
2	Vulcabras S.A.VULC3.SA · Brazil	3.5B BRL (≈$638M)	91	94	90	91	0 / 2
3	Huangshan Tourism Development Co.,Ltd.900942.SS · China	428M USD	90	97	83	88	0 / 2
4	Envela CorporationELA · US-listed	293M USD	89	66	99	95	0 / 2
5	Tsutsumi Jewelry Co.,Ltd.7937.T · Japan	38.1B JPY (≈$259M)	88	96	98	60	0 / 2
⋯
442	Bénéteau S.A.BEN.PA · Europe	386M EUR (≈$424M)	33	69	2	14	1 / 2
442	BEWI ASABEWI.OL · Europe	4.1B NOK (≈$393M)	33	66	20	22	2 / 2
442	BHG Group AB (publ)BHG.ST · Europe	4.4B SEK (≈$444M)	33	54	28	31	2 / 2
442	Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc.HOV · US-listed	604M USD	33	57	9	21	1 / 2
442	Kura Sushi USA, Inc.KRUS · US-listed	442M USD	33	13	85	13	2 / 2
442	Oxford Industries, Inc.OXM · US-listed	423M USD	33	59	17	15	1 / 2
453	Xinglong Holding (Group) Company Ltd.000955.SZ · China	1.9B CNY (≈$262M)	32	9	9	16	0 / 2
453	Greatview Aseptic Packaging Company Limited0468.HK · Hong Kong	3.5B HKD (≈$450M)	32		2	20	0 / 2
453	Jiangxi Huawu Brake Co.,Ltd.300095.SZ · China	3.1B CNY (≈$433M)	32	0	36	16	0 / 2

Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score

Bringing the fundamentals into focus…