Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Karat Packaging Inc.
How Karat Packaging Inc. stacks up
KRT · against 525 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
34/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #340 of 526 · scores higher than 34% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score46 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including KRT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 34?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, which is weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 75% of peers. EBITDA yield: 4.5% vs peer median 8.8%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 5.3% vs peer median 6.1%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 4.8% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = KRT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | KRT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 523 reported | 4.8% | 4.7% | 52% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 537 reported | 4.5% | 9.1% | 25% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 141 reported | 4.9% | 7.4% | 37% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 523 reported | 16.0% | 58.7% | 7% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around KRTScores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score