Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V.
How Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. stacks up
KOF · against 68 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Valuation
32/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #50 of 69 · scores higher than 28% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score7 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including KOF · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 32?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.Mainly because of its free cash flow yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 85% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 0.0% vs peer median 6.2%
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 81% of peers. Earnings yield: 0.1% vs peer median 4.5%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 61% of peers. EBITDA yield: 10.6% vs peer median 8.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = KOF, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | KOF | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 68 reported | Not reported | 4.5% | — | — | 30% |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 69 reported | 10.6% | 8.3% | 72% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 31 reported | Not reported | 6.0% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 68 reported | 32.9% | 32.5% | 55% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around KOF| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 379.9B MXN (≈$20.5B) | 84 | 68 | |
| 2 | 28.1B EUR (≈$30.9B) | 79 | 51 | |
| 3 | 18.7B SGD (≈$14.2B) | 77 | 48 | |
| 4 | 40.7B USD | 75 | 66 | |
| 4 | 13.3B GBP (≈$17.3B) | 75 | 44 | |
| 46 | 3.41T JPY (≈$23.2B) | 37 | 58 | |
| 46 | 29.1B AUD (≈$19.2B) | 37 | 37 | |
| 48 | 18.2B USD | 35 | 43 | |
| 49 | 21.9B USD | 33 | 40 | |
| 50 | 24.5B USD | 32 | 52 | |
| 51 | 47.3B USD | 30 | 47 | |
| 52 | 212.7B CNY (≈$29.8B) | 29 | 72 | |
| 53 | 4.88T JPY (≈$33.2B) | 28 | 56 | |
| 53 | 25.9B USD | 28 | 53 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score