Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V.
How Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. stacks up
KOF · against 147 other Consumer Defensive companies listed in US-listed
Growth
62/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #67 of 148 · scores higher than 54% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score17 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including KOF · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 62?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth, which is stronger than most Consumer Defensive peers.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 0.5% vs peer median 1.5%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 4.3% vs peer median 2.8%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 77% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 8.8% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = KOF, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | KOF | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 152 reported | 4.3% | 4.1% | 51% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 109 reported | 0.5% | 4.5% | 45% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 147 reported | 8.8% | 3.5% | 75% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around KOF| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.5B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 2 | 536M USD | 99 | 39 | |
| 3 | 3.3B USD | 98 | 71 | |
| 3 | 607M USD | 98 | 67 | |
| 5 | 3.5B USD | 97 | 73 | |
| 63 | 3.8B USD | 64 | 50 | |
| 63 | 332M USD | 64 | 43 | |
| 65 | 407.9B USD | 63 | 53 | |
| 65 | 2.7B USD | 63 | 42 | |
| 67 | 24.5B USD | 62 | 52 | |
| 67 | 253M USD | 62 | 18 | |
| 67 | 15.2B USD | 62 | 36 | |
| 70 | 615M USD | 60 | 73 | |
| 71 | 993.6B USD | 59 | 44 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score