Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
KO · against 152 other Consumer Defensive companies listed in US-listed
Ranked #75 of 153 · scores higher than 51% of peers · safety percentile 30
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)14 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including KO · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, which is weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | KO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 144 reported | 1.16× | 0.74× | 32% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 140 reported | 0.34 | 0.55 | 76% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 154 reported | 1.30× | 1.43× | 48% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.9B USD | 99 | 37 | |
| 2 | 3.3B USD | 97 | 89 | |
| 3 | 697M USD | 94 | 34 | |
| 4 | 606M USD | 93 | 67 | |
| 5 | 875M USD | 92 | 33 | |
| 71 | 343.3B USD | 33 | 52 | |
| 72 | 399M USD | 32 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 27 |
| 73 | 33.7B USD | 32 | 49 |
| 74 | 7.4B USD | 31 | 18 |
| 75 | 369.2B USD | 30 | 54 |
| 76 | 2.2B USD | 30 | 41 |
| 77 | 1.7B USD | 29 | 27 |
| 78 | 4.3B USD | 29 | 63 |
| 79 | 12.4B USD | 29 | 46 |