Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Knife River Corporation
How Knife River Corporation stacks up
KNF · against 182 other Basic Materials companies listed in US-listed
Growth
63/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #102 of 183 · scores higher than 44% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score17 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including KNF · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 63?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Basic Materials peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 67% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -8.9% vs peer median 9.4%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 71% of peers. Revenue growth: 12.1% vs peer median 3.4%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 77% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 8.3% vs peer median -0.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = KNF, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | KNF | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 187 reported | 12.1% | 9.9% | 54% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 102 reported | -8.9% | 17.1% | 29% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 180 reported | 8.3% | 1.5% | 68% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around KNF| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13.8B USD | 100 | 83 | |
| 1 | 8.9B USD | 100 | 85 | |
| 3 | 41.2B USD | 99 | 88 | |
| 3 | 6.0B USD | 99 | 76 | |
| 3 | 15.9B USD | 99 | 75 | |
| 98 | 2.7B USD | 64 | 51 | |
| 98 | 6.7B USD | 64 | 42 | |
| 98 | 3.0B USD | 64 | 68 | |
| 102 | 198.6B USD | 63 | 70 | |
| 102 | 3.3B USD | 63 | 54 | |
| 104 | 5.0B USD | 62 | 62 | |
| 105 | 1.0B USD | 61 | 70 | |
| 105 | 6.2B USD | 61 | 61 | |
| 107 | 62.2B USD | 60 | 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score