Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
KMTS · against 439 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #151 of 440 · scores higher than 66% of peers · safety percentile 68
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)48 peers with a safety percentile of 60–69, including KMTS · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio, which is stronger than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | KMTS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 415 reported | 0.34× | 0.22× | 37% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 414 reported | Not reported | 0.52 | — | — | 33% |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 425 reported | 4.69× | 2.79× | 70% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 44 | |
| 2 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 40 | |
| 3 | 2.6B USD | 100 | 43 | |
| 4 | 1.1B USD | 100 | ||
| 5 | 1.0B USD | 99 | 35 | |
| 147 | 141.7B JPY (≈$963M) | 69 | 68 | |
| 148 | 12.8B CNY (≈$1.8B) | 69 | 44 | |
| 149 | 10.2B CNY (≈$1.4B) | 69 | 55 | |
| 150 | 232.9B JPY (≈$1.6B) | 68 | 20 | |
| 151 | 1.7B USD | 68 | 46 | |
| 152 | 217.6B INR (≈$2.6B) | 68 | 67 | |
| 153 | 204.5B JPY (≈$1.4B) | 68 | 71 | |
| 154 | 2.0B USD | 67 | 24 | |
| 155 | 31.0B THB (≈$867M) | 67 | 67 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score