Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Kennametal Inc.
How Kennametal Inc. stacks up
KMT · against 650 other Industrials companies of similar size
Growth
95/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #26 of 651 · scores higher than 95% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score60 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including KMT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 95?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Industrials peers.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 4.3% vs peer median 4.2%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 86% of peers. Revenue growth: 19.8% vs peer median 4.4%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 96% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 254.1% vs peer median 7.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = KMT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | KMT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 656 reported | 19.8% | 5.7% | 88% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 545 reported | 254.1% | 7.5% | 96% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 648 reported | 4.3% | 5.1% | 45% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around KMT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9.4B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 74.1B TWD (≈$2.3B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 22.5B NOK (≈$2.1B) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1 | 2.5B USD | 100 | 70 | |
| 1 | 4.6B USD | 100 | 58 | |
| 26 | 18.2B HKD (≈$2.3B) | 95 | 59 | |
| 26 | 17.1B CNY (≈$2.4B) | 95 | 41 | |
| 26 | 1.3B USD | 95 | 48 | |
| 26 | 1.8B USD | 95 | 77 | |
| 26 | 2.3B USD | 95 | 82 | |
| 26 | 1.7B USD | 95 | 27 | |
| 26 | 2.0B USD | 95 | 44 | |
| 26 | 98.9B INR (≈$1.2B) | 95 | 73 | |
| 34 | 9.8B CNY (≈$1.4B) | 94 | 62 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score