Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
KMDA · against 428 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #100 of 429 · scores higher than 77% of peers · safety percentile 81
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)52 peers with a safety percentile of 80–89, including KMDA · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its beta, debt / equity and current ratio, which are stronger than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | KMDA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 396 reported | 0.04× | 0.19× | 72% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 411 reported | 0.14 | 0.46 | 81% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 422 reported | 4.06× | 2.91× | 61% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 421M USD | 99 | 52 | |
| 2 | 261M USD | 99 | 97 | |
| 3 | 397M USD | 99 | 37 | |
| 4 | 455M USD | 99 | 53 | |
| 5 | 2.7B CNY (≈$375M) | 99 | 67 | |
| 96 | 298M CHF (≈$342M) | 82 | 74 | |
| 97 | 2.8B CNY (≈$396M) | 81 | 29 | |
| 98 | 3.0B CNY (≈$415M) | 81 | 55 | |
| 99 | 239M USD | 81 | 38 | |
| 100 | 418M USD | 81 | 74 | |
| 101 | 63.5B JPY (≈$432M) | 81 | 57 | |
| 102 | 109.3B JPY (≈$743M) | 81 | 76 | |
| 103 | 264M USD | 81 | 24 | |
| 104 | 3.9B CNY (≈$549M) | 80 | 61 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score