Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Kamada Ltd.
How Kamada Ltd. stacks up
KMDA · against 372 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Growth
66/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #113 of 373 · scores higher than 70% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score31 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including KMDA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 66?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth, 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Healthcare peers.
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 66% of peers. Revenue growth: 12.1% vs peer median 6.1%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 67% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 11.7% vs peer median 5.8%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 73% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 39.2% vs peer median 9.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = KMDA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | KMDA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 387 reported | 12.1% | 2.8% | 72% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 187 reported | 39.2% | 2.2% | 77% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 366 reported | 11.7% | 3.1% | 74% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around KMDA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 464M USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 2 | 1.8B HKD (≈$224M) | 99 | 59 | |
| 2 | 7.2B TWD (≈$224M) | 99 | 41 | |
| 2 | 433M USD | 99 | 81 | |
| 2 | 609M USD | 99 | 91 | |
| 108 | 1.1B MYR (≈$245M) | 67 | 70 | |
| 108 | 289M USD | 67 | 57 | |
| 108 | 693M EUR (≈$763M) | 67 | 70 | |
| 113 | 363.6B KRW (≈$262M) | 66 | 55 | |
| 113 | 418M USD | 66 | 74 | |
| 115 | 2.9B CNY (≈$408M) | 65 | 37 | |
| 115 | 5.0B SEK (≈$497M) | 65 | 61 | |
| 117 | 255M USD | 64 | 36 | |
| 118 | 2.9B HKD (≈$365M) | 63 | 84 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score