Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc.
How Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. stacks up
KLIC · against 384 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
54/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #174 of 385 · scores higher than 54% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score47 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including KLIC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 54?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 66% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 1.1% vs peer median 2.7%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 3.1% vs peer median 2.2%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 5.8% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = KLIC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | KLIC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 378 reported | 3.0% | 2.4% | 59% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 389 reported | 5.8% | 4.4% | 62% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 170 reported | 1.1% | 3.1% | 28% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 381 reported | 24.1% | 27.5% | 42% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around KLIC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.1B USD | 100 | 73 | |
| 2 | 27.5B HKD (≈$3.5B) | 98 | 81 | |
| 2 | 16.7B HKD (≈$2.1B) | 98 | 80 | |
| 2 | 117.8B TWD (≈$3.7B) | 98 | 94 | |
| 2 | 40.9B CNY (≈$5.7B) | 98 | 73 | |
| 171 | 3.7B USD | 55 | 67 | |
| 174 | 41.0B CNY (≈$5.7B) | 54 | 55 | |
| 174 | 14.4B CNY (≈$2.0B) | 54 | 59 | |
| 174 | 1.9B USD | 54 | 41 | |
| 174 | 3.8B USD | 54 | 74 | |
| 178 | 15.6B CNY (≈$2.2B) | 53 | 52 | |
| 178 | 2.8B USD | 53 | 70 | |
| 178 | 2.7B USD | 53 | 53 | |
| 181 | 217.4B TWD (≈$6.7B) | 52 | 34 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score