Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Kinross Gold Corporation
How Kinross Gold Corporation stacks up
KGC · against 76 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Growth
95/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #6 of 77 · scores higher than 93% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score13 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including KGC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 95?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth, revenue growth and earnings per share growth, which are stronger than most Basic Materials peers.
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 89% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 158.1% vs peer median 9.4%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 90% of peers. Revenue growth: 36.9% vs peer median 3.4%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 93% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 26.8% vs peer median -0.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = KGC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | KGC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 77 reported | 36.9% | 6.2% | 89% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 64 reported | 158.1% | 30.8% | 84% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 77 reported | 26.8% | 1.6% | 91% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around KGC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13.8B USD | 100 | 83 | |
| 2 | 41.2B USD | 99 | 88 | |
| 2 | 15.9B USD | 99 | 75 | |
| 4 | 486.3B MXN (≈$26.3B) | 98 | 91 | |
| 4 | 30.8B USD | 98 | 83 | |
| 6 | 23.6B USD | 95 | 81 | |
| 7 | 20.8B CAD (≈$15.2B) | 94 | 74 | |
| 7 | 19.6B USD | 94 | 76 | |
| 9 | 43.6B USD | 93 | 81 | |
| 9 | 3.22T INR (≈$38.7B) | 93 | 63 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score