Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Korn Ferry
How Korn Ferry stacks up
KFY · against 498 other Industrials companies of similar size
Growth
47/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #313 of 499 · scores higher than 37% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score60 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including KFY · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 47?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 62% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 1.4% vs peer median 4.2%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 6.6% vs peer median 7.1%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 6.9% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = KFY, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | KFY | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 500 reported | 6.9% | 7.0% | 50% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 434 reported | 6.6% | 9.1% | 46% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 496 reported | 1.4% | 6.6% | 25% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around KFY| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 74.1B TWD (≈$2.3B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 22.5B NOK (≈$2.1B) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1 | 2.5B USD | 100 | 70 | |
| 1 | 5.2B USD | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 4.6B USD | 100 | 58 | |
| 313 | 4.1B USD | 47 | 24 | |
| 313 | 6.7B AUD (≈$4.4B) | 47 | 39 | |
| 313 | 2.2B USD | 47 | 65 | |
| 313 | 1.9B CHF (≈$2.2B) | 47 | 54 | |
| 313 | 4.3B USD | 47 | 64 | |
| 318 | 20.6B CNY (≈$2.9B) | 46 | 53 | |
| 318 | 17.8B CNY (≈$2.5B) | 46 | 46 | |
| 318 | 579.7B JPY (≈$3.9B) | 46 | 49 | |
| 318 | 426.2B JPY (≈$2.9B) | 46 | 60 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score