Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
KEEL · against 538 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #414 of 539 · scores higher than 23% of peers · safety percentile 25
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)44 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including KEEL · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | KEEL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 517 reported | 3.16× | 0.21× | 3% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 518 reported | 4.07 | 0.76 | 1% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 534 reported | 16.26× | 1.86× | 99% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 1.1B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 3 | 2.0B USD | 99 | 45 | |
| 4 | 1.9B USD | 99 | 34 | |
| 5 | 6.6B CNY (≈$922M) | 99 | 44 | |
| 410 | 25.7B TWD (≈$797M) | 27 | 34 | |
| 411 | 6.0B CNY (≈$837M) | 26 | 11 | |
| 412 | 8.1B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 26 | 14 | |
| 413 | 53.3B TWD (≈$1.7B) | 26 | 45 | |
| 414 | 1.4B USD | 25 | 33 | |
| 415 | 109.4B JPY (≈$744M) | 25 | 40 | |
| 416 | 5.2B CNY (≈$735M) | 24 | 35 | |
| 417 | 2.0B EUR (≈$2.2B) | 24 | 47 | |
| 418 | 1.3B USD | 24 | 40 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score