Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to KB Home
How KB Home stacks up
KBH · against 337 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
45/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #202 of 338 · scores higher than 39% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score45 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including KBH · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 45?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.A mix: stronger free cash flow yield and earnings yield, but weaker EBITDA yield than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 61% of peers. EBITDA yield: 6.9% vs peer median 8.8%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 74% of peers. Earnings yield: 7.7% vs peer median 4.4%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 75% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 1.0% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = KBH, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | KBH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 337 reported | 7.3% | 5.4% | 72% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 345 reported | 6.9% | 9.5% | 32% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 136 reported | 12.1% | 5.8% | 85% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 340 reported | 126.6% | 44.1% | 90% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around KBH| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.6B GBP (≈$3.4B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 2 | 248.4B JPY (≈$1.7B) | 98 | 73 | |
| 3 | 25.5B HKD (≈$3.3B) | 97 | 83 | |
| 3 | 8.6B BRL (≈$1.5B) | 97 | 81 | |
| 5 | 12.1B HKD (≈$1.6B) | 96 | 56 | |
| 198 | 2.5B AUD (≈$1.6B) | 46 | 48 | |
| 202 | 826.9B JPY (≈$5.6B) | 45 | 50 | |
| 202 | 570.7B JPY (≈$3.9B) | 45 | 55 | |
| 202 | 3.7B EUR (≈$4.1B) | 45 | 49 | |
| 202 | 3.0B USD | 45 | 45 | |
| 202 | 22.1B SEK (≈$2.2B) | 45 | 52 | |
| 207 | 16.8B CNY (≈$2.4B) | 44 | 45 | |
| 207 | 15.1B CNY (≈$2.1B) | 44 | 63 | |
| 207 | 20.0B SAR (≈$5.4B) | 44 | 65 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score