Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Kadant Inc.
How Kadant Inc. stacks up
KAI · against 558 other Industrials companies of similar size
Growth
62/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #247 of 559 · scores higher than 55% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score66 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including KAI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 62?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its revenue growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are stronger than most Industrials peers.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 3.4% vs peer median 7.1%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 64% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 7.3% vs peer median 4.2%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 76% of peers. Revenue growth: 12.5% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = KAI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | KAI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 560 reported | 12.5% | 6.9% | 72% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 470 reported | 3.4% | 9.0% | 43% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 554 reported | 7.3% | 6.4% | 56% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around KAI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 74.1B TWD (≈$2.3B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 22.5B NOK (≈$2.1B) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1 | 2.5B USD | 100 | 70 | |
| 1 | 5.2B USD | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 4.6B USD | 100 | 58 | |
| 247 | 22.4B NOK (≈$2.1B) | 62 | 64 | |
| 247 | 3.9B USD | 62 | 71 | |
| 247 | 2.4B USD | 62 | 33 | |
| 247 | 3.5B USD | 62 | 63 | |
| 247 | 3.3B USD | 62 | 57 | |
| 247 | 4.0B USD | 62 | 69 | |
| 254 | 14.6B CNY (≈$2.0B) | 61 | 68 | |
| 254 | 279.3B JPY (≈$1.9B) | 61 | 57 | |
| 254 | 79.5B TWD (≈$2.5B) | 61 | 64 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score