Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Jumia Technologies AG
How Jumia Technologies AG stacks up
JMIA · against 659 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Profitability
0/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #646 of 660 · scores higher than 0% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score64 peers with a profitability score of 0–9, including JMIA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 0?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its return on assets and operating margin, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 99% of peers. Return on assets: -25.2% vs peer median 3.3%
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 97% of peers. Operating margin: -32.8% vs peer median 6.4%
- Return on invested capital is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = JMIA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | JMIA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 632 reported | Not reported | 6.4% | — | — | 33% |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 659 reported | -32.8% | 5.7% | 2% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 627 reported | -25.2% | 2.7% | 1% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 615 reported | -216.2% | 6.1% | 1% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 661 reported | 56.3% | 28.3% | 87% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around JMIA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.2B MYR (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 84 | |
| 1 | 9.10T IDR (≈$564M) | 99 | 85 | |
| 3 | 11.2B SEK (≈$1.1B) | 98 | 49 | |
| 3 | 418M USD | 98 | 53 | |
| 5 | 22.1B TWD (≈$685M) | 97 | 65 | |
| 646 | 680M USD | 0 | 21 | |
| 646 | 763M USD | 0 | 19 | |
| 646 | 469M USD | 0 | 36 | |
| 646 | 563M USD | 0 | 47 | |
| 646 | 690M USD | 0 | 15 | |
| 646 | 1.2B USD | 0 | 25 | |
| 646 | 720M USD | 0 | 23 | |
| 646 | 509M USD | 0 | 23 | |
| 646 | 463M USD | 0 | 26 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score