Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd.
How JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. stacks up
JKS · against 496 other Technology companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
58/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #183 of 497 · scores higher than 61% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score55 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including JKS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 58?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.A mix: stronger EBITDA yield, but weaker earnings yield and free cash flow yield than most Technology peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -125.0% vs peer median 2.2%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -59.2% vs peer median 2.7%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 84% of peers. EBITDA yield: 10.7% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = JKS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | JKS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 495 reported | Not reported | 1.9% | — | — | 30% |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 499 reported | 10.7% | 4.0% | 88% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 465 reported | Not reported | 3.3% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 490 reported | 441.3% | 22.1% | 100% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around JKS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.1B USD | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 1.7B USD | 100 | 67 | |
| 1 | 763M USD | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 404M USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 5 | 662M USD | 98 | 57 | |
| 183 | 117.3B USD | 58 | 56 | |
| 183 | 2.5B USD | 58 | 51 | |
| 183 | 747M USD | 58 | 68 | |
| 183 | 2.7B USD | 58 | 48 | |
| 183 | 532M USD | 58 | 25 | |
| 183 | 785M USD | 58 | 51 | |
| 183 | 818M USD | 58 | 65 | |
| 183 | 13.9B USD | 58 | 50 | |
| 183 | 12.9B USD | 58 | 47 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score