Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to J.Jill, Inc.
How J.Jill, Inc. stacks up
JILL · against 493 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
78/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #122 of 494 · scores higher than 75% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score46 peers with a valuation score of 70–79, including JILL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 78?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield, earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 67% of peers. EBITDA yield: 20.3% vs peer median 8.8%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -0.2% vs peer median 4.4%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 80% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 14.5% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = JILL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | JILL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 482 reported | 8.0% | 3.3% | 79% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 505 reported | 11.8% | 8.6% | 65% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 139 reported | 14.0% | 7.1% | 75% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 484 reported | 41.8% | 67.7% | 28% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around JILL| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 382.5B KRW (≈$275M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 4 | 2.3B HKD (≈$296M) | 99 | 59 | |
| 4 | 3.2B HKD (≈$408M) | 99 | 79 | |
| 115 | 1.9B BRL (≈$340M) | 79 | 57 | |
| 115 | 26.5B INR (≈$317M) | 79 | 77 | |
| 122 | 6.7B TWD (≈$209M) | 78 | 65 | |
| 122 | 3.2B BRL (≈$568M) | 78 | 62 | |
| 122 | 335M USD | 78 | 56 | |
| 125 | 53.4B JPY (≈$363M) | 77 | 54 | |
| 126 | 3.7B CNY (≈$512M) | 76 | 57 | |
| 126 | 282M USD | 76 | 63 | |
| 126 | 367M CHF (≈$422M) | 76 | 45 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score