Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to J.Jill, Inc.
How J.Jill, Inc. stacks up
JILL · against 504 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Profitability
69/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #93 of 505 · scores higher than 80% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score49 peers with a profitability score of 60–69, including JILL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 69?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its return on invested capital, which is stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 83% of peers. Return on assets: -0.2% vs peer median 3.3%
- Operating margin is close to the peer norm. Operating margin: 8.1% vs peer median 6.4%
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 90% of peers. Return on invested capital: 27.9% vs peer median 7.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = JILL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | JILL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 478 reported | 27.9% | 4.7% | 95% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 504 reported | 8.1% | 4.8% | 71% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 480 reported | -0.2% | 2.1% | 23% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 469 reported | 20.8% | 4.9% | 93% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 506 reported | 67.7% | 26.2% | 96% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around JILL| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9.10T IDR (≈$564M) | 99 | 85 | |
| 1 | 1.5B BRL (≈$267M) | 99 | 92 | |
| 3 | 396M AUD (≈$262M) | 98 | 78 | |
| 3 | 418M USD | 98 | 53 | |
| 5 | 624M SGD (≈$474M) | 97 | 82 | |
| 93 | 2.8B CNY (≈$395M) | 69 | 75 | |
| 93 | 2.6B CNY (≈$367M) | 69 | 66 | |
| 93 | 1.3B MYR (≈$277M) | 69 | 60 | |
| 93 | 7.3B TWD (≈$227M) | 69 | 62 | |
| 93 | 335M USD | 69 | 56 | |
| 93 | 363M GBP (≈$473M) | 69 | 51 | |
| 93 | 627M CAD (≈$458M) | 69 | 68 | |
| 102 | 3.9B HKD (≈$498M) | 68 | 74 | |
| 103 | 4.7B CNY (≈$663M) | 67 | 75 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score