Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Jiayin Group Inc.
How Jiayin Group Inc. stacks up
JFIN · against 12 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Growth
73/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #5 of 13 · scores higher than 67% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score2 peers with a growth score of 70–79, including JFIN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 73?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth and earnings per share growth, which are stronger than most Financial Services peers.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 7.3% vs peer median 7.4%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 81% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 47.9% vs peer median 10.0%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 82% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 23.9% vs peer median 10.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = JFIN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | JFIN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 13 reported | 7.3% | -7.4% | 83% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 9 reported | 47.9% | 45.7% | 63% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 12 reported | 23.9% | 8.3% | 73% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around JFIN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 956M HKD (≈$122M) | 98 | 71 | |
| 2 | 773M HKD (≈$99M) | 81 | 61 | |
| 2 | 344M MYR (≈$76M) | 81 | 66 | |
| 4 | 4.5B THB (≈$127M) | 79 | 68 | |
| 5 | 82M USD | 73 | 78 | |
| 6 | 11.1B JPY (≈$76M) | 57 | 63 | |
| 7 | 113M USD | 51 | 68 | |
| 8 | 221M CAD (≈$161M) | 39 | ||
| 9 | 412M MYR (≈$91M) | 37 | 63 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score