Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Jefferson Capital, Inc.
How Jefferson Capital, Inc. stacks up
JCAP · against 81 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Valuation
80/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #25 of 82 · scores higher than 69% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score16 peers with a valuation score of 80–89, including JCAP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 80?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Financial Services peers.
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 13.4% vs peer median 5.7%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 78% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 19.1% vs peer median 6.1%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 87% of peers. EBITDA yield: 12.1% vs peer median 6.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = JCAP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | JCAP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 132 reported | 4.5% | 8.3% | 31% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 57 reported | 15.3% | 8.1% | 80% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 52 reported | 19.1% | 11.8% | 67% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 120 reported | 41.3% | 107.4% | 13% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around JCAP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 641M USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 2 | 827M USD | 99 | 62 | |
| 2 | 659M USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 4 | 1.1B CAD (≈$782M) | 98 | 59 | |
| 5 | 8.4B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 95 | 66 | |
| 21 | 37.5B THB (≈$1.0B) | 82 | 58 | |
| 23 | 1.8B EUR (≈$2.0B) | 81 | 53 | |
| 23 | 1.4B EUR (≈$1.5B) | 81 | 48 | |
| 25 | 779M USD | 80 | 60 | |
| 25 | 1.2B USD | 80 | 60 | |
| 27 | 11.3B SEK (≈$1.1B) | 79 | 58 | |
| 27 | 2.1B USD | 79 | 71 | |
| 29 | 1.2B CAD (≈$859M) | 78 | 49 | |
| 29 | 775M USD | 78 | 28 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score