Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to JBT Marel Corporation
How JBT Marel Corporation stacks up
JBTM · against 430 other Industrials companies of similar size
Growth
99/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #4 of 431 · scores higher than 99% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score60 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including JBTM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 99?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth, revenue growth and earnings per share growth, which are stronger than most Industrials peers.
- Earnings per share turned from a loss to a profit. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 7.1%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 96% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 33.3% vs peer median 4.2%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 96% of peers. Revenue growth: 44.9% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = JBTM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | JBTM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 432 reported | 44.9% | 6.5% | 97% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 377 reported | Not reported | 9.1% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 426 reported | 33.3% | 6.4% | 96% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around JBTM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.7B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 5.2B USD | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 4.6B USD | 100 | 58 | |
| 4 | 32.0B CNY (≈$4.5B) | 99 | 73 | |
| 4 | 6.1B USD | 99 | 55 | |
| 4 | 12.1B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 4 | 5.5B USD | 99 | 52 | |
| 8 | 85.2B CNY (≈$11.9B) | 98 | 75 | |
| 8 | 22.2B CNY (≈$3.1B) | 98 | 84 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score