Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Jabil Inc.
How Jabil Inc. stacks up
JBL · against 133 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
64/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #49 of 134 · scores higher than 62% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score21 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including JBL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 64?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield, earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 63% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 4.6% vs peer median 2.7%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 64% of peers. Earnings yield: 3.0% vs peer median 2.2%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 74% of peers. EBITDA yield: 7.0% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = JBL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | JBL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 134 reported | 3.6% | 3.2% | 57% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 131 reported | 8.2% | 5.0% | 82% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 95 reported | 4.6% | 3.3% | 60% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 127 reported | 5.7% | 17.0% | 14% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around JBL| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.5B USD | 97 | 56 | |
| 2 | 1.42T TWD (≈$44.0B) | 95 | 75 | |
| 3 | 3.89T JPY (≈$26.5B) | 94 | 73 | |
| 3 | 20.1B USD | 94 | 68 | |
| 5 | 17.5B USD | 93 | 93 | |
| 46 | 114.4B CNY (≈$16.0B) | 66 | 51 | |
| 47 | 983.8B TWD (≈$30.5B) | 65 | 65 | |
| 47 | 48.3B USD | 65 | 65 | |
| 49 | 32.8B EUR (≈$36.1B) | 64 | 58 | |
| 49 | 28.5B USD | 64 | 50 | |
| 49 | 15.6B USD | 64 | 48 | |
| 52 | 835.6B TWD (≈$25.9B) | 63 | 80 | |
| 52 | 133.6B CNY (≈$18.7B) | 63 | 50 | |
| 54 | 646.8B TWD (≈$20.1B) | 62 | 70 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score