Ranked #344 of 362 · scores higher than 5% of peers · safety percentile 2
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)
84 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including JACK · Click a bar to see the companies
Why “Higher relative risk”?
The measures below combine into a safety percentile of 2 among Consumer Cyclical companies. It is relative: 67 or more is lower relative risk, 33–66 moderate, below 33 higher.
Mainly because of its debt / equity, current ratio and beta, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
▼Shareholders' equity is negative, so debt/equity counts as among the highest in its peer group. Debt / equity: — vs peer median 0.46×
▼fewer short-term assets to cover bills due within a year: weaker than 93% of peers. Current ratio: 0.58× vs peer median 1.48×
▼a share price that has swung more with the market: weaker than 92% of peers. Beta: 1.43 vs peer median 0.63
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = JACK, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
JACK
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Debt / equityLower is better · 319 reported
Not reported
0.99×
—
—
33%
BetaLower is better · 348 reported
1.43
1.14
26%
33%
Current ratioHigher is better · 362 reported
0.58×
1.47×
7%
33%
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
