Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
IXHL · against 37 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #4 of 38 · scores higher than 92% of peers · safety percentile 91
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)5 peers with a safety percentile of 90–100, including IXHL · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | IXHL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 30 reported | 0.00× | 0.15× | 100% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 38 reported | 2.83 | 0.84 | 0% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 39 reported | 48.81× | 2.80× | 95% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.4B JPY (≈$57M) | 98 | ||
| 2 | 276M SEK (≈$28M) | 96 | 48 | |
| 3 | 83.4B KRW (≈$60M) | 93 | 36 | |
| 4 | 31M USD | 91 | ||
| 5 | 83.8B KRW (≈$60M) | 91 | 54 | |
| 6 | 298M SEK (≈$30M) | 83 | 48 | |
| 7 | 22M USD | 81 | 47 | |
| 8 | 277M MYR (≈$61M) | 78 | 67 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score