Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
IVZ · against 55 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Ranked #41 of 56 · scores higher than 27% of peers · safety percentile 21
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)4 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including IVZ · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta and current ratio, which are weaker than most Financial Services peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | IVZ | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 54 reported | 0.12× | 0.53× | 74% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 55 reported | 1.63 | 0.94 | 6% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 45 reported | 0.71× | 1.92× | 7% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9.6B USD | 95 | 73 | |
| 2 | 1.01T INR (≈$12.2B) | 94 | 84 | |
| 3 | 1.42T INR (≈$17.0B) | 94 | 69 | |
| 4 | 7.1B EUR (≈$7.8B) | 93 | ||
| 5 | 1.05T INR (≈$12.6B) | 91 | ||
| 37 | 11.8B USD | 36 | 51 | |
| 38 | 15.9B USD | 29 | 53 | |
| 39 | 13.7B USD | 24 | 42 | |
| 40 | 21.7B USD | 21 | 45 | |
| 41 | 12.5B USD | 21 | 17 | |
| 42 | 15.1B USD | 19 | 49 | |
| 43 | 8.9B USD | 18 | 50 | |
| 44 | 24.5B USD | 17 | 47 | |
| 45 | 16.9B CHF (≈$19.5B) | 17 | 56 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score