Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
IRWD · against 475 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #16 of 476 · scores higher than 96% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score56 peers with a valuation score of 90–100, including IRWD · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its earnings yield, free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Healthcare peers.
| Metric | IRWD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 464 reported | 22.0% | 0.6% | 99% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 482 reported | 26.6% | 3.6% | 98% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 201 reported | 32.1% | -5.0% | 98% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 476 reported | -28.0% | 45.9% | 2% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.5B HKD (≈$451M) | 99 | 51 | |
| 1 | 2.9B HKD (≈$365M) | 99 | 84 | |
| 1 | 89.9B JPY (≈$611M) | 99 | 68 | |
| 1 | 3.1B HKD (≈$396M) | 99 | 61 | |
| 1 | 6.50T IDR (≈$403M) | 99 | 69 | |
| 16 | 44.2B JPY (≈$301M) | 96 | 64 | |
| 16 | 595M USD | 96 | 97 | |
| 16 | 433M USD | 96 | 81 | |
| 16 | 810M USD | 96 | 69 | |
| 16 | 578M USD | 96 | 73 | |
| 23 | 6.6B HKD (≈$840M) | 95 | 71 | |
| 23 | 12.3B TWD (≈$381M) | 95 | 67 | |
| 23 | 3.4B CNY (≈$478M) | 95 | 77 | |
| 23 | 4.7B HKD (≈$606M) | 95 | 75 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score