Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to iRhythm Holdings, Inc.
How iRhythm Holdings, Inc. stacks up
IRTC · against 259 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Valuation
30/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #200 of 260 · scores higher than 23% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score18 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including IRTC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 30?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 67% of peers. EBITDA yield: 0.4% vs peer median 4.0%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -0.3% vs peer median 1.5%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 0.9% vs peer median 0.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = IRTC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | IRTC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 255 reported | -0.3% | 2.5% | 30% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 254 reported | 0.4% | 5.0% | 25% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 138 reported | 0.9% | 0.9% | 50% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 254 reported | 4.5% | 27.5% | 7% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around IRTC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21.3B HKD (≈$2.7B) | 99 | 68 | |
| 1 | 52.2B HKD (≈$6.7B) | 99 | 56 | |
| 1 | 37.3B HKD (≈$4.8B) | 99 | 90 | |
| 1 | 40.2B MXN (≈$2.2B) | 99 | 71 | |
| 5 | 21.1B HKD (≈$2.7B) | 98 | 67 | |
| 192 | 3.3B USD | 33 | 39 | |
| 197 | 3.0B CHF (≈$3.5B) | 32 | 33 | |
| 198 | 2.2B USD | 31 | 36 | |
| 198 | 3.1B USD | 31 | 46 | |
| 200 | 4.2B USD | 30 | 41 | |
| 200 | 4.7B USD | 30 | 42 | |
| 202 | 3.9B USD | 8 | 47 | |
| 202 | 7.7B USD | 8 | 36 | |
| 202 | 6.9B EUR (≈$7.6B) | 8 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score