Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
IRM · against 21 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Ranked #18 of 22 · scores higher than 19% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score3 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including IRM · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its free cash flow yield, earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Real Estate peers.
| Metric | IRM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 22 reported | 1.2% | 3.3% | 10% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 21 reported | 4.6% | 4.9% | 35% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 15 reported | -1.7% | 5.2% | 0% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 21 reported | -3.7% | 40.2% | 10% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.85T JPY (≈$19.4B) | 90 | 67 | |
| 2 | 26.9B USD | 77 | 78 | |
| 3 | 17.9B USD | 68 | 67 | |
| 4 | 19.3B USD | 48 | 54 | |
| 4 | 54.4B USD | 48 | 57 | |
| 13 | 62.3B USD | 31 | 49 | |
| 15 | 148.3B HKD (≈$19.0B) | 30 | 51 | |
| 16 | 56.1B AUD (≈$37.0B) | 29 | 70 | |
| 17 | 17.6B USD | 24 | 37 | |
| 18 | 34.7B USD | 22 | 45 | |
| 19 | 68.1B USD | 19 | 33 | |
| 19 | 48.0B USD | 19 | 44 | |
| 21 | 44.6B USD | 17 | 39 | |
| 22 | 1.75T INR (≈$21.1B) | 9 | 41 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score