Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Opus Genetics, Inc.
How Opus Genetics, Inc. stacks up
IRD · against 380 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Profitability
5/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #356 of 381 · scores higher than 5% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score45 peers with a profitability score of 0–9, including IRD · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 5?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly because of its return on assets and operating margin, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 99% of peers. Return on assets: -115.7% vs peer median 1.7%
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 93% of peers. Operating margin: -513.5% vs peer median 7.1%
- Return on invested capital is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = IRD, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | IRD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 347 reported | Not reported | 0.3% | — | — | 33% |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 351 reported | -513.5% | 2.9% | 8% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 380 reported | -115.7% | -0.3% | 2% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 359 reported | -4796.5% | -1.3% | 0% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 397 reported | -291.9% | 37.1% | 0% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around IRD| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 595M USD | 99 | 97 | |
| 1 | 433M USD | 99 | 81 | |
| 1 | 578M USD | 99 | 73 | |
| 1 | 609M USD | 99 | 91 | |
| 5 | 4.4B CNY (≈$611M) | 98 | 77 | |
| 352 | 314M USD | 6 | 56 | |
| 356 | 397M USD | 5 | 37 | |
| 356 | 389M USD | 5 | 33 | |
| 356 | 274M USD | 5 | 57 | |
| 356 | 327M USD | 5 | 11 | |
| 356 | 215M USD | 5 | 34 | |
| 356 | 469M USD | 5 | 45 | |
| 356 | 549M USD | 5 | 30 | |
| 363 | 6.2B TWD (≈$193M) | 4 | 42 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score