Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to IQVIA Holdings Inc.
How IQVIA Holdings Inc. stacks up
IQV · against 63 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Growth
50/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #40 of 64 · scores higher than 37% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score15 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including IQV · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 50?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Its metrics sit close to the Healthcare norm.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 5.0% vs peer median 5.8%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 14.8% vs peer median 9.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 8.2% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = IQV, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | IQV | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 64 reported | 8.2% | 9.9% | 41% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 49 reported | 14.8% | 16.6% | 48% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 64 reported | 5.0% | 8.2% | 35% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around IQV| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 56.7B USD | 96 | 79 | |
| 2 | 22.8B USD | 95 | 38 | |
| 3 | 40.2B USD | 92 | 73 | |
| 4 | 4.61T JPY (≈$31.3B) | 89 | 76 | |
| 5 | 43.30T KRW (≈$31.2B) | 86 | 68 | |
| 35 | 28.6B USD | 54 | 60 | |
| 37 | 6.17T JPY (≈$42.0B) | 53 | 70 | |
| 37 | 25.8B USD | 53 | 75 | |
| 39 | 27.3B USD | 52 | 55 | |
| 40 | 43.2B USD | 50 | 45 | |
| 40 | 133.4B BRL (≈$24.0B) | 50 | 49 | |
| 42 | 21.7B EUR (≈$23.9B) | 49 | 47 | |
| 43 | 49.5B USD | 48 | 53 | |
| 44 | 54.0B USD | 45 | 47 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score