Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
IPSC · against 336 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #214 of 337 · scores higher than 11% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score124 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including IPSC · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its earnings yield, EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
| Metric | IPSC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 322 reported | -61.2% | -0.3% | 6% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 343 reported | -49.0% | 2.0% | 11% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 174 reported | -32.0% | -9.2% | 20% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 328 reported | 84.7% | 52.1% | 71% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.1B HKD (≈$146M) | 99 | 72 | |
| 1 | 3.5B HKD (≈$451M) | 99 | 51 | |
| 1 | 1.4B HKD (≈$181M) | 99 | 61 | |
| 1 | 2.9B HKD (≈$365M) | 99 | 84 | |
| 1 | 3.1B HKD (≈$396M) | 99 | 61 | |
| 214 | 471M USD | 8 | 21 | |
| 214 | 207M USD | 8 | 41 | |
| 214 | 238M USD | 8 | 41 | |
| 214 | 172M USD | 8 | 3 | |
| 214 | 275M USD | 8 | 46 | |
| 214 | 327M USD | 8 | 11 | |
| 214 | 172M USD | 8 | 41 | |
| 214 | 319M USD | 8 | 28 | |
| 214 | 255M USD | 8 | 36 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score