Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
IPHA · against 177 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #127 of 178 · scores higher than 29% of peers · safety percentile 28
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)14 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including IPHA · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its current ratio and beta, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | IPHA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 160 reported | Not reported | 0.21× | — | — | 33% |
| BetaLower is better · 170 reported | 0.88 | 0.61 | 37% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 174 reported | 0.60× | 2.89× | 7% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 186M USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 2 | 165M USD | 99 | 50 | |
| 3 | 261M USD | 99 | 97 | |
| 4 | 284M AUD (≈$188M) | 98 | 36 | |
| 5 | 213M USD | 98 | ||
| 123 | 188M CHF (≈$216M) | 30 | 74 | |
| 124 | 133M USD | 29 | 51 | |
| 125 | 1.8B HKD (≈$236M) | 28 | ||
| 126 | 166.9B KRW (≈$120M) | 28 | 48 | |
| 127 | 149M USD | 28 | 10 | |
| 128 | 200.2B KRW (≈$144M) | 28 | 62 | |
| 129 | 1.8B CNY (≈$255M) | 27 | 29 | |
| 130 | 213M EUR (≈$235M) | 27 | 40 | |
| 131 | 384.1B KRW (≈$277M) | 27 | 40 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score