Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
IPGP · against 423 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #32 of 424 · scores higher than 93% of peers · safety percentile 93
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)39 peers with a safety percentile of 90–100, including IPGP · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its debt / equity and current ratio, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | IPGP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 413 reported | 0.01× | 0.27× | 94% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 407 reported | 0.98 | 0.95 | 47% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 419 reported | 6.18× | 1.84× | 92% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 2 | 32.0B CNY (≈$4.5B) | 100 | 75 | |
| 3 | 5.4B USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 4 | 2.0B USD | 99 | 45 | |
| 5 | 1.9B USD | 99 | 34 | |
| 28 | 1.6B USD | 95 | 72 | |
| 29 | 4.1B USD | 94 | 67 | |
| 30 | 4.41T KRW (≈$3.2B) | 94 | 66 | |
| 31 | 14.4B CNY (≈$2.0B) | 94 | 59 | |
| 32 | 3.2B USD | 93 | 45 | |
| 33 | 13.8B CNY (≈$1.9B) | 93 | 55 | |
| 34 | 2.2B USD | 91 | 27 | |
| 35 | 3.9B USD | 91 | 36 | |
| 36 | 3.4B USD | 91 | 52 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score