How IPG Photonics Corporation stacks up

IPGP · against 426 other Technology companies of similar size

Overall

45/ 100

Below the middle of the pack.

Ranked #286 of 427 · scores higher than 32% of peers

Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the overall score

78 peers with an overall score of 40–49, including IPGP · Click a bar to see the companies

The four scores behind it

Overall = average of valuation, growth, profitability and safety percentile (categories without data are skipped)

Valuation#267 of 420Score 38 / 100 · beats 35%Growth#374 of 423Score 14 / 100 · beats 10%Profitability#318 of 426Score 33 / 100 · beats 24%Risk#32 of 424Lower relative risk · safety 93 · beats 93%

Ranking by overall score

Top 5 and the companies ranked around IPGP

Rank	Company	Market cap	Overall	Valuation	Growth	Profitability	Risk
1	LEENO Industrial Inc.058470.KQ · South Korea	4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B)	97		97	94	0 / 2
2	Transcend Information, Inc.2451.TW · Taiwan	117.8B TWD (≈$3.7B)	94	98	95	99	0 / 2
3	JustSystems Corporation4686.T · Japan	311.5B JPY (≈$2.1B)	86	88	62	97	0 / 2
3	Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.FORTY · US-listed	1.8B USD	86	97	94	84	0 / 2
3	Remitly Global, Inc.RELY · US-listed	5.4B USD	86	68	99	89	0 / 2
⋯
277	Fastly, Inc.FSLY · US-listed	3.4B USD	46	17	71	13	0 / 2
277	Insight Enterprises, Inc.NSIT · US-listed	4.9B USD	46	77	43	47	2 / 2
286	Wafer Works Corporation6182.TWO · Taiwan	53.3B TWD (≈$1.7B)	45	29	91	34	2 / 2
286	GDS Holdings LimitedGDS · US-listed	4.4B USD	45	81	29	50	2 / 2
286	IPG Photonics CorporationIPGP · US-listed	3.2B USD	45	38	14	33	0 / 2
286	Pony AI Inc.PONY · US-listed	2.0B USD	45	10	67	5	0 / 2
290	Shenzhen Topband Co., Ltd.002139.SZ · China	12.2B CNY (≈$1.7B)	44	52	30	39	1 / 2
290	Zhejiang Wazam New Materials Co.,LTD.603186.SS · China	20.7B CNY (≈$2.9B)	44	36	65	55	2 / 2
290	Shanghai @hub Co.,Ltd.603881.SS · China	17.0B CNY (≈$2.4B)	44	51	38	73	2 / 2

Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score

Bringing the fundamentals into focus…