Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
IPAR · against 153 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Ranked #85 of 154 · scores higher than 44% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score17 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including IPAR · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Defensive norm.
| Metric | IPAR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 149 reported | 4.5% | 5.0% | 44% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 154 reported | 7.1% | 9.6% | 31% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 58 reported | 6.5% | 7.2% | 47% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 144 reported | 23.2% | 46.0% | 21% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 34.8B HKD (≈$4.5B) | 96 | 75 | |
| 1 | 57.07T IDR (≈$3.5B) | 96 | 75 | |
| 3 | 56.3B HKD (≈$7.2B) | 95 | 71 | |
| 3 | 24.2B HKD (≈$3.1B) | 95 | 64 | |
| 5 | 355.7B JPY (≈$2.4B) | 94 | 70 | |
| 82 | 651.6B JPY (≈$4.4B) | 50 | 75 | |
| 82 | 14.6B CNY (≈$2.1B) | 50 | 71 | |
| 82 | 25.4B NOK (≈$2.4B) | 50 | 37 | |
| 85 | 25.2B NOK (≈$2.4B) | 48 | 50 | |
| 85 | 3.7B USD | 48 | 60 | |
| 87 | 3.4B CAD (≈$2.5B) | 47 | 49 | |
| 88 | 2.71T KRW (≈$2.0B) | 46 | 52 | |
| 88 | 5.1B CHF (≈$5.8B) | 46 | 52 | |
| 90 | 35.1B MXN (≈$1.9B) | 45 | 50 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score