Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Interparfums, Inc.
How Interparfums, Inc. stacks up
IPAR · against 151 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Growth
58/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #66 of 152 · scores higher than 56% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score18 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including IPAR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 58?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Defensive norm.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 2.9% vs peer median 2.8%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 4.2% vs peer median 1.5%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 73% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 7.4% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = IPAR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | IPAR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 152 reported | 2.9% | 3.7% | 47% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 130 reported | 4.2% | 7.2% | 47% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 152 reported | 7.4% | 3.9% | 71% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around IPAR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 30.7B BRL (≈$5.5B) | 100 | 76 | |
| 1 | 5.5B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 3 | 8.84T KRW (≈$6.4B) | 98 | 72 | |
| 3 | 29.8B HKD (≈$3.8B) | 98 | 76 | |
| 3 | 3.3B USD | 98 | 71 | |
| 62 | 60.6B SEK (≈$6.1B) | 63 | 43 | |
| 62 | 2.7B USD | 63 | 42 | |
| 65 | 5.1B CHF (≈$5.8B) | 61 | 52 | |
| 66 | 19.3B CNY (≈$2.7B) | 58 | 67 | |
| 66 | 3.7B USD | 58 | 60 | |
| 66 | 2.5B GBP (≈$3.2B) | 58 | 60 | |
| 69 | 3.9B USD | 57 | 64 | |
| 70 | 2.7B GBP (≈$3.6B) | 56 | 43 | |
| 71 | 231.3B TWD (≈$7.2B) | 55 | 35 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score