Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Innospec Inc.
How Innospec Inc. stacks up
IOSP · against 372 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Valuation
50/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #203 of 373 · scores higher than 45% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score50 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including IOSP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 50?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Basic Materials norm.
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 2.0% vs peer median 2.6%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 8.4% vs peer median 8.5%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 4.9% vs peer median 3.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = IOSP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | IOSP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 367 reported | 4.9% | 4.6% | 52% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 380 reported | 8.4% | 9.6% | 42% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 100 reported | 2.0% | 3.9% | 36% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 359 reported | 55.0% | 56.7% | 48% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around IOSP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.39T ARS (≈$1.4B) | 100 | 53 | |
| 2 | 2.73T KRW (≈$2.0B) | 99 | 57 | |
| 2 | 2.6B USD | 99 | 81 | |
| 4 | 69.8B ZAR (≈$3.8B) | 98 | 76 | |
| 4 | 4.7B AUD (≈$3.1B) | 98 | 87 | |
| 195 | 4.0B USD | 52 | 54 | |
| 201 | 15.7B CNY (≈$2.2B) | 51 | 43 | |
| 201 | 3.3B USD | 51 | 54 | |
| 203 | 24.9B CNY (≈$3.5B) | 50 | 63 | |
| 203 | 2.4B USD | 50 | 67 | |
| 203 | 2.0B AUD (≈$1.3B) | 50 | 52 | |
| 203 | 4.2B AUD (≈$2.8B) | 50 | 44 | |
| 207 | 9.0B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 49 | 33 | |
| 207 | 11.3B CNY (≈$1.6B) | 49 | 56 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score