Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Intapp, Inc.
How Intapp, Inc. stacks up
INTA · against 409 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
23/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #343 of 410 · scores higher than 15% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score40 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including INTA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 23?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -0.5% vs peer median 4.2%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -1.2% vs peer median 2.2%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 4.2% vs peer median 2.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = INTA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | INTA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 403 reported | -1.2% | 2.4% | 14% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 413 reported | -0.5% | 4.5% | 10% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 179 reported | 4.0% | 3.2% | 55% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 405 reported | 9.3% | 27.5% | 11% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around INTA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.1B USD | 100 | 73 | |
| 2 | 27.5B HKD (≈$3.5B) | 98 | 81 | |
| 2 | 16.7B HKD (≈$2.1B) | 98 | 80 | |
| 2 | 117.8B TWD (≈$3.7B) | 98 | 94 | |
| 2 | 40.9B CNY (≈$5.7B) | 98 | 73 | |
| 338 | 2.0B USD | 24 | 22 | |
| 338 | 4.5B EUR (≈$4.9B) | 24 | 23 | |
| 343 | 37.9B CNY (≈$5.3B) | 23 | 14 | |
| 343 | 3.5B USD | 23 | 35 | |
| 343 | 3.4B USD | 23 | 39 | |
| 343 | 1.8B USD | 23 | 56 | |
| 343 | 2.1B USD | 23 | 9 | |
| 348 | 28.9B HKD (≈$3.7B) | 22 | 41 | |
| 348 | 30.5B CNY (≈$4.3B) | 22 | 39 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score