Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
INSM · against 98 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #90 of 99 · scores higher than 0% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score10 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including INSM · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its EBITDA yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
| Metric | INSM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 97 reported | -3.9% | 3.2% | 5% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 99 reported | -3.6% | 5.9% | 4% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 62 reported | -3.5% | 3.9% | 3% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 93 reported | 3.3% | 22.1% | 9% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 89.5B HKD (≈$11.5B) | 98 | 67 | |
| 2 | 21.5B USD | 95 | 60 | |
| 3 | 11.6B USD | 94 | 58 | |
| 3 | 68.0B BRL (≈$12.2B) | 94 | 67 | |
| 5 | 4.61T JPY (≈$31.3B) | 93 | 76 | |
| 90 | 21.8B USD | 8 | 32 | |
| 90 | 33.3B USD | 8 | 24 | |
| 90 | 23.5B USD | 8 | 27 | |
| 90 | 13.7B USD | 8 | 45 | |
| 90 | 22.8B USD | 8 | 38 | |
| 90 | 26.0B USD | 8 | 28 | |
| 90 | 41.6B USD | 8 | 34 | |
| 90 | 12.6B USD | 8 | ||
| 90 | 14.0B USD | 8 | 31 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score