Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Insmed Incorporated
How Insmed Incorporated stacks up
INSM · against 95 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Growth
95/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #4 of 96 · scores higher than 97% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score6 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including INSM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 95?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly thanks to its revenue growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are stronger than most Healthcare peers.
- Still loss-making, but the loss per share narrowed. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 9.8%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 94% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 61.6% vs peer median 5.8%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 97% of peers. Revenue growth: 185.8% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = INSM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | INSM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 97 reported | 185.8% | 8.6% | 99% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 75 reported | Not reported | 14.9% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 95 reported | 61.6% | 7.2% | 98% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around INSM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21.4B USD | 97 | 67 | |
| 2 | 16.5B USD | 96 | 37 | |
| 2 | 14.5B USD | 96 | 30 | |
| 4 | 22.8B USD | 95 | 38 | |
| 5 | 40.2B USD | 92 | 73 | |
| 6 | 138.4B HKD (≈$17.7B) | 91 | 70 | |
| 7 | 4.61T JPY (≈$31.3B) | 89 | 76 | |
| 7 | 13.8B USD | 89 | 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score