INSG TechnologyBeta data

Inseego Corp.

$4.53+0.00%

Price as of close on Nov 3, 2026 · Financials updated Sep 30, 2026

Basics

Sector: Technology
Industry: Communication Equipment
Country: United States
Market cap: 73.7M USD
Enterprise value: 129.5M USD
Full-time employees: 266

Overall health

Drawback: less profitable than most peersless profitable than peers
Drawback: growing more slowly than most peersgrowing more slowly than peers
Drawback: its shares are priced higher than most peers relative to what it earnspriced higher than peers for its earnings
Drawback: higher risk than most peers: its share price swings more than most peers’ (beta 1.66 vs a peer median of 0.87) and less short-term liquidity (current ratio 1.07 vs a peer median of 1.83)higher risk: bigger price swings (beta 1.66 vs peers 0.87) and less liquidity (current ratio 1.07 vs peers 1.83)

Ranks #1,579 of 1,612 technology companies (bottom 3%)

See how it ranks against its peers

Worth knowing

Profitable, but burning cash. Reports a profit, but free cash flow is negative.
Inseego reports a profit but its free cash flow is negative: it spent more on investment and running the business than it brought in. That's common for companies building capacity, but it means the profit isn't yet turning into cash.
Negative shareholders' equity. Liabilities exceed assets on the balance sheet.
Inseego's liabilities exceed its assets on the balance sheet. Large share buybacks can cause this in healthy companies, but so can accumulated losses; either way, debt-based ratios need care.
Valuation signals disagree. Cheaper than 60% of peers on earnings, but only 0% on operating cash profit (EBITDA).Cheaper than 60% of peers on earnings, but only 0% on operating cash profit.
Relative to its earnings, Inseego looks cheaper than 60% of peers; relative to its operating cash profit (EBITDA), cheaper than only 0%. The valuation score blends the two, so look at which measure fits this business best.Relative to its earnings, Inseego looks cheaper than 60% of peers; relative to its operating cash profit, cheaper than only 0%. The valuation score blends the two, so look at which measure fits this business best.
Revenue is falling. Revenue fell 13% in the fiscal year to Dec 2025 vs the year before.
Inseego's revenue fell 13% in the fiscal year to Dec 2025 vs the year before.

StockQuotient Score

11/ 100

Oct 5 12 → Nov 4 11 (-1)

Fundamentals: Yahoo Finance, not primary filings

Valuation

Is the price right?

26/100

Weak▲ 1 since Oct 27 close

3/3 inputs reported · High confidence

Why it changed since the Oct 27, 2026 close: Score 25 → 26

Share price -8.7%+1

Each step re-scores the company against its peers as they were on Oct 28, 2026; the parts add up to the change. Price effects on EBITDA yield are approximate.

Why

Weaker than most peers on:

▼ EBITDA yield
▼ FCF yield

Compare with peers

Behind the score

Sector-normalized EBITDA, earnings, and free cash flow yields.

Earnings yield3.1%

Yahoo Finance · trailing 12 monthsReported value30% base weight · Z-score 0.37Sector median: 0.0225 · MAD: 0.0225

EBITDA yield-4.3%

Yahoo Finance · trailing 12 monthsNegative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price50% base weight · Z-score -1.17Sector median: 0.0423 · MAD: 0.0361

Free cash flow yield-27.0%

Yahoo Finance · trailing 12 months · operating cash flow − capital spendingNegative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price20% base weight · Z-score -1.00Sector median: 0.0274 · MAD: 0.0274

Other data (not scored)

Book yield-41.1%

Yahoo FinanceOutlier capped at sector 5th/95th percentileInformational · 0% composite weightSector median: 0.3292 · MAD: 0.1754

Growth

Is it growing?

6/100

Weak

2/3 inputs reported · Partial data

Why

Weaker than most peers on:

▼ 3-yr revenue
▼ Revenue growth

Compare with peers

Behind the score

Revenue and earnings-per-share growth over one year, and revenue growth over three years.

Earnings per share growthUnavailable

Missing · left out of the score · no sector data, so not countedNot counted · remaining weights rescaledSector median: 0.1108 · MAD: 0.3050

3-year revenue growth-12.2%

Yahoo Finance · 3 fiscal years to Dec 2025Reported value33% base weight · Z-score -2.14Sector median: 0.0483 · MAD: 0.0793

Revenue growth-13.1%

Yahoo Finance · fiscal year to Dec 2025Reported value33% base weight · Z-score -2.13Sector median: 0.0853 · MAD: 0.1017

Profitability

Does it earn well?

12/100

Weak

3/3 inputs reported · High confidence

Why

Weaker than most peers on:

▼ ROIC
▼ ROA
▼ Operating margin

Compare with peers

Behind the score

Return on invested capital, operating margin, and return on assets.

Operating margin2.8%

Yahoo Finance · fiscal year to Dec 2025Reported value33% base weight · Z-score -0.49Sector median: 0.0631 · MAD: 0.0710

Return on assets-5.0%

Yahoo Finance · trailing 12 monthsReported value33% base weight · Z-score -2.20Sector median: 0.0293 · MAD: 0.0362

Return on invested capital-99.4%

Yahoo Finance · trailing 12 monthsOutlier capped at sector 5th/95th percentile33% base weight · Z-score -4.27Sector median: 0.0676 · MAD: 0.0857

Other data (not scored)

Gross margin41.1%

Yahoo Finance · trailing 12 monthsReported valueInformational · 0% composite weightSector median: 0.3343 · MAD: 0.1632

Return on equityUnavailable

Missing · left out of the scoreInformational · 0% composite weightSector median: 0.0753 · MAD: 0.0889

Risk

Debt, liquidity, price swings

Higher

Higher relative risk

3/3 inputs reported · High confidence

Why

Weaker than most peers on:

▼ Debt / equity
▼ Beta
▼ Current ratio

Compare with peers

Behind the score

Relative to sector peers: 0 = lower relative risk · 1 = moderate · 2 = higher. Based on leverage, beta and liquidity.

Beta1.66

Yahoo Finance · 5-year monthly beta vs the marketReported value33% base weight · Z-score -2.12Sector median: 0.8710 · MAD: 0.3700

Current ratio1.07×

Yahoo FinanceReported value33% base weight · Z-score -1.11Sector median: 1.8295 · MAD: 0.6848

Debt / equityUnavailable

Shareholders' equity is negative, so debt/equity counts as among the highest in its peer group33% base weight · Z-score -7.82Sector median: 0.2495 · MAD: 0.2270

Valuation, growth and profitability scores: higher is better. Risk: 0 is lower, 2 is higher. Risk is a relative proxy, not a bankruptcy probability. Scores depend on available sector peers.

Questions investors ask about Inseego

Is Inseego getting weaker?: Filing-by-filing changes are tracked only for companies that file with the US SEC. Its overall score is unchanged at 11/100 since Oct 28, 2026.
How is Inseego valued vs its peers?: Priced higher than most peers relative to what it earns. Valuation scores 26/100 against 1,711 technology peers. EBITDA yield -4.3% vs a peer median of 4.2% (weaker than 100% of peers).EBITDA yield -4.3% vs peers 4.2% (weaker than 100% of peers).
Is Inseego growing?: More slowly than most of its peers. Growth scores 6/100 against 1,711 technology peers. 3-year revenue growth -12.2% vs a peer median of 4.8% (weaker than 91% of peers).3-year revenue growth -12.2% vs peers 4.8% (weaker than 91% of peers).
How profitable is Inseego?: Less profitable than most of its peers. Profitability scores 12/100 against 1,711 technology peers. Return on invested capital -99.4% vs a peer median of 6.8% (weaker than 100% of peers).Return on invested capital -99.4% vs peers 6.8% (weaker than 100% of peers).
How risky is Inseego?: Higher risk relative to 1,711 technology peers, judged on debt, liquidity and share-price swings. Beta 1.66 vs a peer median of 0.87 (weaker than 87% of peers).Beta 1.66 vs peers 0.87 (weaker than 87% of peers). A relative measure, not a bankruptcy probability.

Industry valuation context

Sector: Technology · 320 companies

Valuations in Technology are above their usual range since 2016.

70% of months since 2016 were valued lower than now.
37% of companies are in the most expensive fifth of their own price-to-sales history.
Over 24 months, company values +5% and earnings +25% (medians): earnings grew faster than prices.
Median price-to-sales is +68% vs the whole market, against a usual +58%.

2016Shaded: most expensive fifth of its range2026

Shown for Technology: too few Communication Equipment companies have a long enough history of their own.

Financials

Detailed annual statements come from structured SEC filing data, which most US companies and some foreign filers provide. They aren’t available for this company yet.

INSG price history

Price history is added with the daily price update and will appear after the next one.

Similar companies

Sector leaderboards

LEENO Industrial Inc.058470.KQ97/ 100

Transcend Information, Inc.2451.TW94/ 100

Joint Stock Company Kaspi.kzKSPI93/ 100

Bringing the fundamentals into focus…

Overall health

Drawback: less profitable than most peersless profitable than peers

Drawback: growing more slowly than most peersgrowing more slowly than peers

Drawback: its shares are priced higher than most peers relative to what it earnspriced higher than peers for its earnings

Drawback: higher risk than most peers: its share price swings more than most peers’ (beta 1.66 vs a peer median of 0.87) and less short-term liquidity (current ratio 1.07 vs a peer median of 1.83)higher risk: bigger price swings (beta 1.66 vs peers 0.87) and less liquidity (current ratio 1.07 vs peers 1.83)

Ranks #1,579 of 1,612 technology companies (bottom 3%)

See how it ranks against its peers

Worth knowing

Profitable, but burning cash. Reports a profit, but free cash flow is negative.

Inseego reports a profit but its free cash flow is negative: it spent more on investment and running the business than it brought in. That's common for companies building capacity, but it means the profit isn't yet turning into cash.

Negative shareholders' equity. Liabilities exceed assets on the balance sheet.

Inseego's liabilities exceed its assets on the balance sheet. Large share buybacks can cause this in healthy companies, but so can accumulated losses; either way, debt-based ratios need care.

Valuation signals disagree. Cheaper than 60% of peers on earnings, but only 0% on operating cash profit (EBITDA).Cheaper than 60% of peers on earnings, but only 0% on operating cash profit.

Relative to its earnings, Inseego looks cheaper than 60% of peers; relative to its operating cash profit (EBITDA), cheaper than only 0%. The valuation score blends the two, so look at which measure fits this business best.Relative to its earnings, Inseego looks cheaper than 60% of peers; relative to its operating cash profit, cheaper than only 0%. The valuation score blends the two, so look at which measure fits this business best.

Revenue is falling. Revenue fell 13% in the fiscal year to Dec 2025 vs the year before.

Inseego's revenue fell 13% in the fiscal year to Dec 2025 vs the year before.

Questions investors ask about Inseego

Is Inseego getting weaker?

Filing-by-filing changes are tracked only for companies that file with the US SEC. Its overall score is unchanged at 11/100 since Oct 28, 2026.

How is Inseego valued vs its peers?

Priced higher than most peers relative to what it earns. Valuation scores 26/100 against 1,711 technology peers. EBITDA yield -4.3% vs a peer median of 4.2% (weaker than 100% of peers).EBITDA yield -4.3% vs peers 4.2% (weaker than 100% of peers).

Is Inseego growing?

More slowly than most of its peers. Growth scores 6/100 against 1,711 technology peers. 3-year revenue growth -12.2% vs a peer median of 4.8% (weaker than 91% of peers).3-year revenue growth -12.2% vs peers 4.8% (weaker than 91% of peers).

How profitable is Inseego?

Less profitable than most of its peers. Profitability scores 12/100 against 1,711 technology peers. Return on invested capital -99.4% vs a peer median of 6.8% (weaker than 100% of peers).Return on invested capital -99.4% vs peers 6.8% (weaker than 100% of peers).

How risky is Inseego?

Higher risk relative to 1,711 technology peers, judged on debt, liquidity and share-price swings. Beta 1.66 vs a peer median of 0.87 (weaker than 87% of peers).Beta 1.66 vs peers 0.87 (weaker than 87% of peers). A relative measure, not a bankruptcy probability.