Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
INGR · against 124 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Ranked #52 of 125 · scores higher than 59% of peers · safety percentile 59
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)16 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including INGR · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker beta than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | INGR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 125 reported | 0.39× | 0.42× | 52% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 122 reported | 0.64 | 0.33 | 17% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 120 reported | 2.80× | 1.56× | 83% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.1B USD | 99 | 37 | |
| 2 | 29.8B HKD (≈$3.8B) | 98 | 76 | |
| 3 | 3.1B USD | 97 | 89 | |
| 4 | 1.06T JPY (≈$7.2B) | 96 | 80 | |
| 5 | 58.1B CNY (≈$8.1B) | 94 | 39 | |
| 48 | 849.3B INR (≈$10.2B) | 62 | 56 | |
| 49 | 73.28T IDR (≈$4.5B) | 61 | 67 | |
| 50 | 785.5B JPY (≈$5.3B) | 60 | 62 | |
| 51 | 13.9B NZD (≈$8.4B) | 60 | 75 | |
| 52 | 6.1B USD | 59 | 58 | |
| 53 | 25.6B CNY (≈$3.6B) | 59 | 41 | |
| 54 | 80.7B CNY (≈$11.3B) | 59 | 56 | |
| 55 | 8.84T KRW (≈$6.4B) | 58 | 72 | |
| 56 | 115.4B NOK (≈$11.0B) | 57 | 56 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score